Call me crazy but I’d like to know how safe and effective that delivery mechanism is. On the one hand there’s the problem of unnecessary hurdles, on the other there’s the need to do science.

Perhaps we should remove all unnecessary hurdles while still doing science. Doing science means keeping track of who takes it and what happens to them (good and bad).

If we’re proposing testing a new delivery mechanism for all vaccines, I’m 100% in favor. If we’re proposing skipping the science part I’m 100% opposed.

Cringe headline and writing, but interesting ethical questions.

Interesting read! I’m a total outsider, but the supplement argument seems reasonable to me.