No shares in company, but 550 employees received a $240M gift from their owner

53 pointsposted a month ago
by gfortaine

12 Comments

andrekandre

a month ago

  > Instead of individual performance bonuses, the company introduced group incentives tied to safety and operational targets.
this is how it should be imo; focus on quality overall and other things fall into place

jongjong

a month ago

This is how it should be if we had a scarce money supply (e.g. gold-backed). If it was truly people handing out their own hard-earned money, then it would be great and we would know they TRULY deserved it.

With an infinite (fiat) money supply, where money flows are controlled by algorithms, it's a disaster. $400k is a HUGE amount of money for most people. Giving that much money to 400 people is disruptive.

Someone with $400k worth of assets has a MUCH easier life than someone with less than $50k assets.

If all billionaires and multi-millionaires did this, we'd end up in an extremely unjust society where two sets of people would work equally hard and because of random algorithm-based selection, one set of people would be millionaires and the other set would be essentially homeless. It's a recipe for disaster.

It just multiplies the injustice of the current system. Be prepared for more hacking, more fraud, more theft, more drug trafficking... People who aren't getting the lucky treatment will have to survive somehow in this lottery economy.

There's been a trend now that keeps getting worse; as the mainstream economy becomes increasingly unmeritocratic, the shadow economy becomes increasingly meritocratic; the 'bad' guys feel increasingly justified, increasingly skilled, increasingly ruthless, increasingly good at avoiding consequences. You need to be really skilled to succeed in the dark economy. In the mainstream economy, you just need to be lucky. That's the message unfortunately.

When you help some people in this zero-sum system, it's always at the expense of other people who are out of view.

pcurve

a month ago

To be paid out over five years. A great retention bonus too for the new owner.

VladVladikoff

a month ago

So $87k/year per employee? Sorry I can’t actually read the OP it keeps crashing my browser.

missedthecue

a month ago

Does this create an accrued liability on the balance sheet?

userbinator

a month ago

It's $240M total for all >550, to make the title less clickbaity.

huhkerrf

a month ago

Just because you misunderstood the title doesn't make it clickbait. It seemed pretty obvious that it was a total amount.

nipponese

a month ago

The ultimate "trust me bro".

> Potential buyers and others warned against the idea.

> ... [the] Walkers froze salaries for several years amid the difficulties.

> [the CEO] wanted to do something good. He also worried about going to a local grocery store and feeling ashamed he hadn’t shared his windfall.

LewisVerstappen

a month ago

Will be interesting to see how many of them have money left after 5 years

subdavis

a month ago

This seems really cynical. Did you mean it that way?

coldtea

a month ago

Does it matter? It's their money, and they have needs and wants.

The difference with multi-millionaires and billionaires is that they can cover they wants and even mere whims, and the whole system gives them opportunities to keep and multiply their money.