pella
7 hours ago
> especially from tech company blogs,
https://stripe.com/blog/engineering
https://engineering.linkedin.com/
https://engineering.atspotify.com/
https://careersatdoordash.com/engineering-blog/
--
Aggregators:( https://engineering.fyi/ ; https://diff.blog/ )
+ https://hn.algolia.com/?query=engineering%20blog
---
create a public engineering-blog SKILL.md. ( ~ collect the writing patterns that work on HN )
i_k
7 hours ago
I am quite surprised and a bit disappointed that almost none of them have RSS.
But thank you!
reallydoubtful
2 hours ago
Most of them have feeds.
* https://engineering.fb.com/feed
* https://netflixtechblog.com/feed
* No feed for stripe
* https://www.uber.com/en-GB/blog/london/engineering/rss/
* No feed for LinkedIn
* https://engineering.atspotify.com/feed
* https://tailscale.com/blog/index.xml
petercooper
6 hours ago
Not RSS exactly but this OPML has feeds for several hundred such blogs if you can filter down from there: https://peterc.org/misc/engblogs.opml
phrotoma
2 hours ago
Your website is a work of art. Bravo <3
onion2k
6 hours ago
Spotify and Tailscale do...
embedding-shape
6 hours ago
> I am quite surprised and a bit disappointed that almost none of them have RSS.
I think it's on purpose. It is to signal that these (those without RSS) aren't really "engineering" blogs at all, they're marketing websites aimed to help with recruiting and making the organization seem "engineering-like".
zbentley
5 hours ago
What? That makes no sense. RSS is beloved and known among engineers. Marketers? Not so much.
embedding-shape
5 hours ago
Exactly, so if the blog doesn't have RSS, you know they're probably made from marketers with no input from engineering, otherwise they'd have RSS on the blogs.
Edit: Ah, noticed I made a without/with typo, fixed that, should make about 2% more sense now for the ones who the original meaning was unclear :)
zbentley
5 hours ago
Oh, I read your post backwards (thought you said RSS == more likely fluff). My fault, sorry!
embedding-shape
5 hours ago
To be fair to you, my original comment did say:
> It is to signal that these (those with RSS) aren't really "engineering" blogs at all
So now when I corrected that with/without typo, it looks like your previous comment doesn't make sense, but it kind of did, at the time. Sorry about that and thanks for making me realize the typo!