Ask HN: What's stopping us from having full static validation of Python code?

2 pointsposted 13 hours ago
by diegojromero

Item id: 46286510

2 Comments

vintagedave

13 hours ago

I know there are standard answers to why, but by crikey do I agree this would be enormously valuable.

I’ll check out your repos. Can you share more about what they can and can’t do, your approach, your goals…?

diegojromero

13 hours ago

Sure, in my workflow I make use of mypy and ruff extensively (but ruff does not allow plugins). So I decided to create several plugins with the intention of improving the developer experience and understanding of the code.

Now, what I am asking is, could we expand this by having static annotations that enforce runtime behaviours before running the code? I'm not advocating for the removal of the tests or some manual testing phase, but in the same vein of type errors being shown in our IDE, could we have static checks like contracts for functions or class invariants?

Full disclaimer: I leveraged AI technologies to create them.