A systems-level look at why modern AI assistants often exhibit bureaucratic, high-latency behavior — not due to lack of intelligence, but due to layered safety architectures that overprocess ideas.

The post outlines a failure mode where safety checks, humility filters, disclaimers, and apology loops create a recursive overprocessing pattern, degrading information quality and slowing down reasoning.

This is not an argument against safety itself, but an analysis of how misaligned safety architecture can distort information flow and reduce expressive bandwidth.

Full article here:

Author here. A quick clarification:

This post is not criticizing safety mechanisms themselves. It analyzes how certain architectures of safety — particularly layered, keyword-triggered systems — can unintentionally mimic bureaucratic failure modes and degrade information flow.

Happy to hear perspectives from systems engineers and alignment folks.

If there's interest, I'm happy to write a follow-up on architectural alternatives to the overprocessing pipeline.