Having even one piece of mandatory unremovable software implies a whole chain of removed software freedom. Might be useful to dig into this and see who's pushing it - Lord Cass again?

I wonder if tattooing the EURion constellation (1) near my genitals would prevent it from being photographed.

Or, if it would break face recognition systems... (the one tattooed near the face)

(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation

These puritan clowns would first need to define what constitutes "nudity". But then this entire endeavour is just another pretext to increase digital control. The ambiguity of "nudity" only helps their cause.

"Today we're introducing a feature we think you'll love - privacy-preserving FaceTime calls from anywhere. Now you can be running late in your morning routine while still keeping in touch with loved ones and business colleagues. Make it even more fun and express your personal style with ClothesMoji, from business casual to festive seasonal options."

Source: https://www.ft.com/content/0ef79775-eadf-4cc9-b32c-e97b0eff8... (https://archive.ph/Vrw4i)

Well cant have penetration scaring the people, unless its london

Not everything needs a software based solution. When it comes to nudity I believe that the best way to prevent the spread of nudity is to stop it at the source, right there at the genitals, with physical coverings. This way the nudity is blocked before it has the opportunity to become a victim of mass-dissemination.