al_borland
11 hours ago
The rankings on these lists do not square well with my life experience up to this point. The ones I thought would be at the top were non-existent or deep into the article in a specific table. The ones near the top of all the lists, I’ve never seen used in real life.
aaronjbecker
10 hours ago
I have a follow-up post that covers "common" unisex names, which I arbitrarily defined as names with at least 25k births for both sexes. This one does have more of the names you were probably expecting to see: https://nameplay.org/blog/common-unisex-names-by-gender-rati...
The ranking for the linked post is based on a diversity index, which scores most highly for names closest to an exact 50-50 split. Hence framing it as the "most non-binary" of the unisex names. Admittedly this is more a statistical curiosity than a reflection of everyday life.
al_borland
10 hours ago
Thanks, this makes sense. I was starting to think I was even more of a hermit than I thought.