bronco21016
7 hours ago
There are some other pictures circulating showing the exterior of the aircraft. It definitely appears something hit the aircraft. There is a skid mark on the frame around the window.[1]
Will be interesting to read if an investigative report is made public.
[1]https://viewfromthewing.com/new-cockpit-photos-may-show-what...
stevehawk
3 hours ago
anyone know why these photos have random paperclip/clippy icons?
dmbche
21 minutes ago
Not sure but first thought was part of the right to repair movement having adopted clippy as a mascot/logo (louis rossman)
echelon
9 minutes ago
They use clippy, not paperclips.
Specifically the cartoon stock art clippy from the original video essay: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_Dtmpe9qaQ
Notice how almost all the comments on that video bear the clippy icon. It's spreading everywhere. Twitter, Reddit, Instagram ...
slicktux
3 hours ago
Probably OPs’ version of watermark..?
Archonical
an hour ago
Watermarks usually have branding to indicate ownership. Two distinct 3D paperclip overlays don't seem like watermarks and JonNYC doesn't use them in all photos he's posted on his thread on Bluesky.
They don't even seem to serve as visual cues.
fragmede
6 hours ago
Interesting, that link says it might just be hail.
bronco21016
6 hours ago
A lot doesn't add up from that article though. The writer mentions the window in question is the Captain's window. From the pictures, it appears to be the First Officer's window. Also, the writer mentions pock marks consistent with hail damage in other areas of the aircraft but I haven't found any images substantiating that.
Hail is absolutely the most probably explanation, the article points to two other instances with similar outcomes. I think the doubt comes from the lack of evidence of hail or convective activity or other hail damage on the aircraft. Also, the pilot reportedly said he saw something coming at the aircraft.
grapesodaaaaa
9 minutes ago
I feel like a hail would cause a strong radar return that would have been noticed or at least documented by NEXRAD or onboard systems.
I’m sure the NTSB investigation will consider this angle, and we will find out eventually.
JCM9
5 hours ago
Most journalists are pretty bad when it comes to covering aviation so I wouldn’t put much weight on the discrepancies. Half the time they can’t tell the difference between a jet and a Cessna 172. Seriously.
potato3732842
4 hours ago
Reminds me of this gem:
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/6d/79/e9/6d79e9982b92c476e1d671f31...
thayne
an hour ago
Journalists are generally pretty bad at covering any technical topic, unless the journalist has some specific training in that topic, which is rare.
herewulf
29 minutes ago
Indeed. As an engineer I ask an expert to review anything technical that I write (or program) for accuracy where I'm not an expert, but for some reason journalists don't do this. And so here we are.