jader201
2 hours ago
> Within hours of the first injection, the animal brains showed a nearly 45 percent reduction in clumps of amyloid-beta plaques, a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease.
> The mice had previously shown signs of cognitive decline, but after all three doses, the animals performed on par with their healthy peers in spatial learning and memory tasks. The benefits lasted at least six months.
1. This is great news… for mice with Alzheimer’s that don’t mind treatments every 6 months.
2. It’s crazy to think about something like this actually curing Alzheimer’s in humans, even if for just 6 months. Even more so if repeated doses have the same effects.
3. As with all of these studies, mice != humans, but it’s nice to have hope.
Side note: the temporary part of #2 makes me think about The Last Days of Ptolemy Grey [1]. It’s hard to fathom having a relative “come back” like that for a short time. Or even permanently.
nharada
an hour ago
If this was effective on humans I think most people would accept having treatments 2x a year
copperx
an hour ago
One must live a very privileged life to mind a 2x a year inconvenience in exchange for a working brain.
I wouldn't mind 10x a day injections if it keeps Alzheimer's at bay. Actually, I wouldn't mind a continuous IV drip.
bitmasher9
43 minutes ago
I usually consider dialysis to be the point where treatments start to become very limiting. Twice a week, most people feel tied to their dialysis clinic and cannot go far from it.
jader201
27 minutes ago
Of course, but that’s assuming:
1. There aren’t serious side effects that make it more of a tradeoff
2. The price isn’t on the order of 6-7 figures (or possibly less for some)
whycome
an hour ago
I don’t know why this isn’t a case where human subjects for the tests aren’t allowed.
jryb
an hour ago
You’re not seeing all the other candidate treatments that made things worse. If it just gives everyone a heart attack immediately the question would be, why didn’t you try this out on mice first?
jpollock
an hour ago
If the disease is severe enough to justify an untested treatment with unknown toxicity they aren't aware enough to grant consent.
qwertytyyuu
an hour ago
This test shows effectiveness, they also need to go through trials to test for safety and unintended side effects
wahnfrieden
an hour ago
Human can’t consent in this case but they can feel immense pain and suffering still in ways that failed experimentation could invoke. Which may be worse than further decay and eventual death.