> The bill would define “covered manufacturer” to mean a person who is a manufacturer of a device, an operating system for a device, or a covered application store. The bill would require a developer, as defined, with actual knowledge that a user is a child via receipt of a signal regarding a user’s age to, to the extent technically feasible, provide readily available features for parents to support a child user with respect to the child user’s use of the service and as appropriate given the risks that arise from use of the application, as specified.

Tell me how this exempts linux systems, the distro authors, and every app developer for said operating systems.

So, an IT director might have to certify that all sysadmins and developers are over 18?

And what if a child has access to email or other service run on that system. Tomorrow, I'll give some thought to wi-fi and other routers.

I see nothing excepted.

YMMV

Sounds like devices can be required to ask for a birth date.

Surely that information could never leak out, or be used for other purposes.