Dutch government takes control of Chinese-owned chipmaker Nexperia

233 pointsposted 13 hours ago
by piskov

117 Comments

Doxin

15 hours ago

Some more context from a dutch news source[0]:

The ministry of economic affairs intervened out of a fear that crucial technological skills and capacities will leave the Netherlands and Europe. The ministry stated in a press release[1] that there was a threat of a "knowledge leak" (w/e that means exactly) and a possible threat to the European economy.

After this intervention the Dutch government can now stop or reverse decisions within the company. That's only allowed if those decisions are harmful to the interests of the company, or for the future of the company as a Dutch or European business, or to the retaining of this crucial value chain for europe.

The company can appeal this decision in court.

For context, the law that allows this all to happen was passed in 1952 and has never before been used. As much as I think our government is currently ran by a bunch of nincompoops, I am inclined to believe that something quite significant was about to happen for this law to get invoked. What exactly that was can for now only be speculated about.

I can recommend you run google translate (or equivalent) on the press release. It's as close as you can get to the source of this news for now. I can only imagine the government is going to be having plenty of debates on the topic coming up, seeing as this is a very rare use of a very heavy-handed tool.

[0] https://nos.nl/artikel/2586270-kabinet-grijpt-hard-in-bij-ch...

[1] https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2025/10/12/wet-b...

itopaloglu83

an hour ago

Everybody is a fan of free access and capital markets, until a foreign entity purchases something of importance.

It’s a continuation of recent trends and closing markets.

Nobody in their sane mind would allow a company like ASML or the likes to be purchased by competitors.

But the irony is that when a non-European entity were to do something like this, e.g. nationalize their oil or mining etc. industry or a firm, the whole hell would brake loose.

mc32

a minute ago

Of course the preferred option is what the Chinese do which is to never let that happen in the first place or if you do allow foreign investment always keep a 50.1% stake in the entity and exfiltrate any tech from the venture you need .

bdangubic

a minute ago

USA is nationalizng Intel and under this administration more of the commie shit is coming :)

like_any_other

2 minutes ago

> But the irony is that when a non-European entity were to do something like this, e.g. nationalize their oil or mining etc. industry or a firm, the whole hell would brake loose.

As far as I understand, Samsung, TSMC, and SMIC are all closely guarded by their respective governments. And China doesn't (didn't?) allow foreign companies to operate in China without a local partner at all. So I don't see the irony - everyone practices protectionism, some are just more subtle about it than others.

HPsquared

an hour ago

"For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law."

itopaloglu83

an hour ago

I wonder how this would affect patent applications, since after such an event, some countries might not respect patents for their internal markets.

incompatible

40 minutes ago

This has always been the case, to some degree, but I think it will be a much bigger factor now that so many have accepted that Neoliberalism is dead and no longer give it lip service.

tmnvix

3 hours ago

> For context, the law that allows this all to happen was passed in 1952 and has never before been used.

Interesting parallel here with China recently invoking - for the first time - their own legislation from the 50's to ban rare earth exports for military uses.

walkabout

3 hours ago

Probably not an awesome sign if multiple actors are invoking never-used laws that were created while WWII was still fresh on everyone's mind.

awesome_dude

an hour ago

s/while WWII was still fresh/the cold war was

infinet

44 minutes ago

Netherlands imported more CeO2 (a rare earth) from China than any other country, with 517 metric tons during the first half of 2025.

this_user

an hour ago

That whole REE thing is more of a scare tactic than anything. REEs are really not all that rare, and the current imports of REEs into the US are worth around $200-250M annually. That is millions, not billions. It's actually a laughably small amount.

The main reason that it's mostly China producing them may simply be due to the fact that the volumes are so small that building your own industry is not really worth it.

tmnvix

an hour ago

Dollar value is not the point. For the US MIC this matters a lot. There are not really any ready replacements for some vital weapons components at a time when US weapons stockpiles have been heavily depleted.

trhway

2 hours ago

I always wondered how the large unified world of Roman Empire with running water and sewer fell apart (and backwards) into multitude of small feudal pieces with no technology to speak of for the 1000 years after Roman Empire. I think our modern civilization is probably at the beginning of similar process.

zigzag312

33 minutes ago

Aren't you exaggerating it?

trhway

21 minutes ago

I lived in USSR, and know first hand that it means to be separated from common technological space. USSR wasn't that small, especially if one adds Eastern Block, yet it was falling behind the world becoming fully incapable to produce their own comparable computers, cars, etc.. If world get to split into such islands, the speed of technological progress will fall dramatically while social progress may go fully backwards. If you look at some ideologies rising around the world - they are straight medieval, and in many cases only connectedness to outside world has been preventing them from taking over their "islands".

markus_zhang

an hour ago

I think we are fine in term of infra -- I don't work as a civil engineer, but considering companies in my city repair the roads every year /s they probably retain the knowledge.

galangalalgol

an hour ago

How easy is the machinery and tools needed to keep all the infrastructure running? Earth movers are pretty maintainable and barely depreciate. Survey tools though? They have gotten famcy right? Water management has gone quite high tech in some ways. I could see them falling apart kind of like when some hospitals had to revert to paper tape logs. It didn't scale anymore.

trhway

an hour ago

The infra today is internet and semiconductors which run it, as well as global shipping without each we end up without even necessities.

fakedang

an hour ago

Exactly. Building roads and aqueducts were empire-level knowledge skills in Ancient Rome, performed by the army legions. Thankfully they're highly localized skills today.

selimthegrim

2 hours ago

Why stop there why not Indus Valley Civilization

trhway

40 minutes ago

our knowledge (at least my knowledge of it) is much much smaller that that of Roman Empire, and in particular i don't know whether the fall of that civilization demonstrated the effect of splitting into multitude technologically inferior pieces stagnating for such a long time after that.

dylan604

3 hours ago

How can you say what the minerals were actually used for though is the question I always have in these types of situations. There are multiple uses of the minerals. Since I've now gotten a literal boat load of the minerals from you, I can use those minerals on other things which now frees up my personal source of minerals on the things you didn't want them used in. In the spirit of the agreement, I'm in full compliance all while achieving the thing you didn't want me to achieve. It's nothing but Pilate washing his hands

dgfitz

3 hours ago

Are you tracking that harvesting REM is a nasty business with a lot of “don’t look” environmental impacts? As such, most countries don’t do it, or have an infrastructure for it.

dylan604

2 hours ago

https://rareearthexchanges.com/best-rare-earth-mining-compan...

Plenty of US companies ready and willing. They've finally gotten an administration that is of like mind on screw the environment and dig dig dig.

markus_zhang

an hour ago

US also needs all those factories and machinery to process the stuff.

dgfitz

2 hours ago

So, you agree?

dylan604

2 hours ago

Agree with what? What is it that you think is a gotcha here?

dgfitz

2 hours ago

Most countries don’t do it, including the US.

“Ready and willing” is quite the turn of phrase.

dylan604

2 hours ago

I've seen US numbers along 70-80% is imported. That leaves 20-30% domestic. Some of the REEs are 100% imported, so that's a different issue. But you seem to be implying that the US is 100% importing all REEs with no domestic production at all. That's not true. Yes, some production is slowed due to environmental issues. Some of it is a different nature along the lines of "why mine yours when you can buy someone else's". You keep yours in the ground until you have to get it. You have some small production just to keep the know-how, but you keep the stove down to a simmer from a boil.

tmnvix

an hour ago

> Some of it is a different nature along the lines of "why mine yours when you can buy someone else's". You keep yours in the ground until you have to get it.

My understanding is that a large part of the issue is processing capacity/ability - not mining of the ore. In fact, a significant amount of ore mined in the US is sent to China for processing. I don't think it's a simple case of the US standing up some processing plants in 1-2 years. If that were the case, wouldn't you think it would've happened by now? Is US leadership that bad that they failed to address this risk? Or - more likely - is it because solving the issue will take a lot more than some quick investment?

This is a huge issue for the US MIC. Plans (e.g. with regard to Iran) are going back to the drawing board for sure.

phil21

7 minutes ago

> Is US leadership that bad that they failed to address this risk?

I mean, quite obviously? Borne by the simple fact of... here we are discussing it?

It doesn't matter how easy, quick, or hard it is right now. What matters is leadership is so bad it was allowed to reach this point to begin with, and even a decade ago it was immediately obvious that it was a giant vulnerability that has not even started on beyond corrected in any meaningful way.

fakedang

an hour ago

USA does not have the refining capacity which will take another 8 years to build out.

nonethewiser

3 hours ago

So what just happened logistically?

I assume this is an entirely independent Chinese company without some Dutch sponsor or something. That conforms to local regulations. But now The Dutch government says "we have this new power over you" and that is that. With the consequence presumably being export control on dutch tech, banning from their market, etc? Or were there any more hooks planted that make it easier to force compliance? For example -- and I assume this is not the case in the Netherlands -- in China there is a 51% ownership of the foreign company by a local company (which is more or less state controlled).

Denvercoder9

2 hours ago

> I assume this is an entirely independent Chinese company without some Dutch sponsor or something.

It's not, it's a Dutch company, formed according to Dutch law, with headquarters in the Netherlands, that was bought by another Chinese company a few years ago.

Dutch law sets rules on how any company, but especially public companies (so-called naamloze vennootschappen) must be governed. Even if you own all the shares, by law you don't have unlimited and unchecked power in the company, you have to abide by governance rules.

Seemingly simultaneously with the government order, a suit was brought to the court enforcing these laws (the Ondernemingskamer) alledging that the CEO and owner were not abiding by them. The court documents are a bit weird to me as a non-lawyer, with Nexperia named as both plaintiff and defendant, so I'm not sure who brought it, but it might've been the government, who are named as a party.

The court agreed that the suit could have merit, and as an interim measure while the legal proceedings play out, has suspended the CEO and named a temporary director. It also suspended the authority of the owners over their shares (except for one), and assigned a trustee to manage them temporarily. The court did not actually rule on the contents of the suit yet, it only issued interim conservatory measures. We'll likely hear more about how the suit plays out over the next few months.

An interesting matter of contention in the suit is that the CEO/owner want the CLO to be suspended, while the other side asks the court to prohibit firing of the CLO. I presume there has been a conflict in the board, either leading to or caused by the government order.

The court documents are public by the way (in Dutch, obviously): https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/resultaat?zoekterm=nexperi...

consp

2 hours ago

Sounds like the OR (ondernemingsraad) apparently wants to get rid of the CEO for incompetence which is very interesting. It is extremely hard to prove (in a court of law) but a valid reason. I assume they were doing all kind of shady things if they go that route. (Havent read the Court Docs, it is a guess)

OR vs CEO also explains the duplicate entries as they are both representatives of the company.

niels8472

2 hours ago

From what I've read it was the company's own board that asked for the ceo (Wing) to be removed.

q3k

3 hours ago

> I assume this is an entirely independent Chinese company.

It's worth noting that Nexperia is a spin-off of NXP (Dutch company) which itself is a spin-off of Philips' (Dutch company) semiconductor division.

It's also worth noting that Nexperia's Chinese owners (Wingtech) are at least partially state controlled.

khuey

2 hours ago

Nexperia was also spun off to placate Chinese regulators back when Qualcomm wanted to acquire NXP, and then after the spin off the Chinese regulators still refused to approve the acquisition.

galangalalgol

an hour ago

Does that mean teensy mcu are now chinese owned? That was one of the last non chinese mcu available.

nudgeee

38 minutes ago

Teensy is based on iMXRT which are NXP, not Nexperia.

teekert

3 hours ago

Perhaps also worth noting that ASML is also a spin-off of Philips.

jacquesm

2 hours ago

And that the two collaborate closely on all kinds of projects, and that NXP (the former owner of the business unit that became Nexperia) and Nexperia (the company that is the focus of this action) are both customers of ASML.

rzerowan

14 hours ago

Maybe pressure from the US gov? As a negotiatingtactic vs China - remeber the moves against MotorSich in Ukraine some years back , where the deal was win-win for both but Washington put the kibosh on it and ultimately got destroyed by Russian offensive. Since the speed/urgency and unusual application of the law as you mention , mean extraodinary actions must have quite extraordinary causes. In any case still too many unknowns in the story , hopefully clarity ensues soonest.

Doxin

11 hours ago

Believe it or not, but the dutch government has agency. It's not impossible for US pressure to be a factor, but I think it's more likely the management of the company was planning to move production to china or something like that. That'd (rightly!) spook the government into some quick action, especially given the political climate around Russia seemingly not being content with having their war confined to Ukraine.

Unfortunately we seem to be living in interesting times.

dragonelite

3 hours ago

The US has immense pressure on the dutch government, given their control over ASML . Its US big tech and semi design studios that determines who will need to buy EUV from ASML. Given ASML is not allowed to do business with China, Russia etc.

fwipsy

an hour ago

You could just add easily argue that the Dutch government has immense leverage over the US, since ASML controls the leading edge fab technology that underpins Nvidia etc. It seems more to me like a highly profitable partnership that neither side can credibly threaten to withdraw from.

sgt101

2 hours ago

Where else will they buy EUV from?

mytailorisrich

2 hours ago

Ultimately the Dutch, like for instance the Australians, are a rounding error compared to China and a pawn in a bigger game. At least the Dutch can "hide" behind the EU.

So there will noise but this won't stop China' rise and it won't stop Europe's decline, either.

echelon

3 hours ago

> Unfortunately we seem to be living in interesting times.

China played a remarkably smart game. We let it happen.

People have been telling us for twenty years that this would happen and nobody listened until it was almost too late.

bigbadfeline

2 hours ago

Either way, it cannot be stopped, China will develop independent technology sector because they can and they have no other choice. They don't trust the West and cases like this make such attitude understandable.

As soon as China tries to compete with the rich monopolies, the "free market" goes out of the window and becomes "free to do as we tell you".

thewebguyd

2 hours ago

> As soon as China tries to compete with the rich monopolies, the "free market" goes out of the window and becomes "free to do as we tell you".

Hence big tech cozying up to this administration, and all the attempts to ban AI regulation.

China won already, US is just trying to stop the bleeding

corimaith

2 hours ago

>As soon as China tries to compete with the rich monopolies, the "free market" goes out of the window and becomes "free to do as we tell you".

When China cannot compete with incumbents those protections also go up and when they can now people like you appeal to free trade (while ignoring existing protections). You are being overly charitable to one side here. Which is it? Free trade or Protectionism?

miohtama

2 hours ago

Could be worse. Could be TikTok and threat to national security.

1oooqooq

25 minutes ago

thanks for the context.

any idea what we the rationale/reason to pass that law in the first place? any specific endangered war resource at the time?

NicoJuicy

3 hours ago

Germany implemented something similar like this after China took over Kuka (industry leading robotics) and practically build an entire industry of robotics in China after that.

And of course, the jobs disappeared from Germany.

q3k

3 hours ago

Did they? As far as I know Kuka is still fully controlled by Midea.

NicoJuicy

3 hours ago

The regulation was created after that

em-bee

2 hours ago

the jobs didn't disappear (yet). they grew from 13.000 in 2014 before midea took over to 15.000 in 2024. maybe they could have grown more in germany if midea hadn't taken over. who knows.

markus_zhang

3 hours ago

Time to quote one of my favourite lines in the Godfather franchise. Probably totally unrelated.

“We gladly put you at the helm of our little fleet, but our ships must all sail in the same direction. Otherwise, who can say how long your stay with us will last. It's not personal, it's only business. You should know, Godfather”

— The late venerable Don Lucchesi

dcrazy

2 hours ago

I couldn’t place this quote, so I googled it and learned it’s from Godfather Part 3. Bold choice to take your favorite quote from that particular movie. :)

mmaunder

2 hours ago

Oh lord no. Pacino’s Scream made acting history and is of the finest scenes to come out of the Strasberg acting ecosystem. Critics gonna crit, but there are some remarkably good things about that film.

markus_zhang

an hour ago

Yeah there are so many memorable quotes.

binarymax

3 hours ago

I'm currently blazing through "Chip War" and can't put it down. This news is fascinating in that context. I highly recommend the book to anyone who hasn't read it.

rdl

3 hours ago

I don't understand why this suddenly happened (except if asked by the USG in response to the recent scare/reality over rare earths).

The 50% ownership by a sanctioned entity was a reality for a while, and was an issue as soon as the purchase. This didn't change recently. So, this action should have been part of the pre-purchase review (CFIUS in the US...I assume there is an equivalent in China). On the face of it, this all could have been avoided by having a non-sanctioned entity (including another random Chinese company) own enough of the company to get sanctioned entity ownership below 50%.

bsder

4 minutes ago

> I don't understand why this suddenly happened

I could easily see Nexperia chips appearing in Russian munitions in Ukraine setting this off.

It would also match charging the CEO with "incompetence". It would be pretty easy to win that in court if the chips are appearing in Russian weaponry.

tnt128

2 hours ago

Negotiation leverage. Had they prevent the purchase in the first place, they won’t have anythings to negotiate now.

Luker88

2 hours ago

I don't know if something similar was feared, but I would like to remind people of what happened in 2020 with China and ARM.

You don't get into the China market without losing control.

bgnn

2 hours ago

A bit of history:

Nexperia was formed because back in 2017 (if I remember correctly) Qualcomm wanted to buy NXP. So NXP wanted to look more attractive to Qualcomm shareholders and sold its more low-tech business unit to Chinese investors. That acquisition didn't go through because of the tensions between US and China during the first Trump admin.

NXP has been trimming fat since its formation from Philips Semiconductors and American or Chinese companies are buying whatever business unit they can grab. They pretty much buy it for the IP and the customers. Once they get the IP they usually fore the whole team and shut dient operations in NL.

Nexperia wasn't doing this though. They had no interesting technology to steal oe transfer to China to begin with.

piskov

11 hours ago

Also real kicker from 2022:

The UK used its National Security & Investment Act (2021) to order divestment of Nexperia’s Newport Wafer Fab in Nov 2022. The UK ordered them to sell 86% of the stake due to National Security concerns

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/acquisition-of-ne...

rickdeckard

16 hours ago

Would be interested to hear some details on this from someone within Nexperia (or the automotive customers it supplied), if anyone is here on HN

That governmental decision was surely not taken lightly, it's a significant move with high risk of increasing geopolitical tension...

jacquesm

15 hours ago

That will not happen. But yes, you are right that this decision was not taken lightly, I've only heard of one other such move in the last 50 years or so.

The Chinese propaganda machine is already making lots of waves about how NL is no longer a democracy and how this dings NL reputation abroad.

The Dutch have put restrictions on Wingtech to not make certain changes (sale or move of assets, intellectual property, company activities, employees) for a year. That should give you enough to chew on I think (and it is public knowledge). Specifically the IP and assets bits are in focus here, more so because the parent company is on a watchlist. Note that they not only kicked out the CEO - which in itself is an earth shaking move for a company this big - they also took control over the shares.

misiek08

2 hours ago

50 years of sending all the knowledge to China and now sudden realization that „data is the value”. Work was cheap, but we paid in IP and tech as a whole. It’s great to see how long term is China strategy and how well they execute it.

Good luck for us all being „independent”. We can make processors out of attached plastic bottle caps…

brazukadev

21 minutes ago

It is funny that there are more people blaming China than the shareholders that made trillions of dollars.

jauntywundrkind

2 hours ago

Nexperia makes quite a line-up of parts. Huge range of pretty low level things, various logic and bus small devices, mountains of transistors. https://www.mouser.com/manufacturer/nexperia/featured-produc...

They have a not huge but very nice line-up of GaN fet devices too. I'd been looking through their line-up here just lack week!

Just fun to see what's on offer here. I couldn't find a latest listings by manufacturer for Nexperia, which is one of my favorite Mouser views.

h45gJaqk

2 hours ago

The timing is weird, just after Trump's latest escalation with China. Using The Netherlands to fall into the sword would fit with the general tactics of dumping the Ukraine war on the EU and trying to sour their relations with China.

That way, the U.S. is free to control all oil resources in the Middle East and conquer new ones in Venezuela. The EU gets nothing but enemies and higher oil and gas prices.

In principle I'm against outsourcing or technology transfers to China, but please do it on you own schedule.

Denvercoder9

2 hours ago

> The timing is weird, just after Trump's latest escalation with China.

The news is coming out now, but it actually happened September 30th.

jacquesm

2 hours ago

Correlation != causation.

brazukadev

11 hours ago

This excuse could be used by many countries to seize European companies controlling strategic national resources

jsiepkes

3 hours ago

Let's be real here, a European company wouldn't even have been allowed to buy a Chinese company in China and have the level of control as in this case in the first place.

tartoran

3 hours ago

This is it pretty much, not sure why it took so long to come to this realization. Was it greed that caused a warp in rational and common sense?

stackskipton

2 hours ago

Greed. When China was becoming manufacturing powerhouse, it was incredibly cheap, and Chinese government seemed extremely willing to play ball by making sure there was no government caused slowdowns. This obviously worked until it didn't but even now, it's so expensive to change, corporations are screaming about their quarterly stock price and US being so financialized, US in a real gordian knot.

q3k

3 hours ago

Just the religious belief that The Free Market will solve everything on its own and there should be no attempt to interfere with it.

jaccola

3 hours ago

I never understood this, I believe very strongly in the free market, but only where there is a free market. Of course you can let the free market run free up to the border of e.g. the US but surely it won't solve international trade since many countries do not have a free market. Unless we agree some international rules such that the boundary of the free market "sandbox" becomes the earths borders.

It's why I also think it is possible to hold a pro-free-market pro-tariff position simultaneously without contradiction. Tariffs could be used to "level set" manipulation from foreign governments and make the incoming goods behave as if they were not manipulated (thus also reducing the incentive to manipulate in the first place).

Not sure this is how tariffs are being used in reality.

corimaith

an hour ago

You are 100% correct. Free Trade hasn't been disproven, only the inane notion that one should pursue unreciproval free trade with a countries that perform mercantalism against them.

The consumer isn't everything, the worker does matter just as much.

array_key_first

31 minutes ago

Greed sure, but also optics. In the US at least, we love to condemn China for being "communist" and not a real democracy. Remember, for the US, communist has been the number one enemy for a long time. Obviously, we can't do what they do.

But we do what they do, and China isn't even communist.

Longlius

3 hours ago

And which firms in China are controlled by European entities?

DiogenesKynikos

34 minutes ago

European companies have had massive investments in China for decades now.

Many people in the West have no idea what's going on in China. Western brands and investments are all over the place. Half the cars on the streets used to be European or American (and that has only recently changed, due to the rise of EVs).

Yet Europeans and Americans often complain, "Why can't Western companies operate in China?" Excuse me?

constantcrying

3 hours ago

There are many companies which the Chinese government could target in retaliation. In China foreign companies are usually minority partners in some ventures with some Chinese company.

klooney

2 hours ago

> foreign companies are usually minority partners

So, uh, none?

isaacremuant

3 hours ago

It's ok. It's fine when the EU does it. It's only wrong and against capitalism when others do it. Like protectionism.

VagabundoP

3 hours ago

I think its fine to have national and strategic interests. China isn't someone that you can just trust, they are exporting to Russia on the sly and therefore supporting war in Europe because it suits them.

dmix

2 hours ago

> and therefore supporting war in Europe because it suits them.

FWIW, EU countries are still sending more money to Russia for oil than they send Ukraine in aid. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/24/eu-spends-more...

Modern global economies are complicated.

corimaith

an hour ago

This is a tired talking point. If the EU stopped those imports abruptly they'd blow up their own economies and there would be chaos on the streets.

It is stupid that they put themselves in that position, but they've also greatly reduced their dependency as the war progressed.

With the current trade war and their own domestic troubles, China cannot afford to alienate other foreign markets, hence why this is the prime time to drive concessions against them.

dylan604

3 hours ago

> they are exporting to Russia on the sly

is it really on the sly though?

holoduke

2 hours ago

The Euro stance on buying US weapons for Ukraine is probably the most dumbest strategic move or the century. Europe is losing at an alarming rate in many ways. I would be more concerned about the US if I were Europe.

corimaith

2 hours ago

Well clearly clinging free trade while others pursue protectionism/industrial strategy at massive scales against you isn't sustainable.

Is it hypocrisy of you decide to punch back after getting punched? Not really. And China certainly was the much more protectionist than the EU for the three decades.

saubeidl

3 hours ago

Why is "against capitalism" == wrong? Maybe it's right because it's against capitalism.

constantcrying

3 hours ago

Great. Absolutely outstanding from the Dutch government, to not let China dominate Europe however it wants.

Securing a Chip industry independent from China, Taiwan and the US has to be the top long term security interest. I only hope that the EU can use it's power to make things like this more feasible and to keep Europe independent from US/Chinese interests.

thewebguyd

2 hours ago

> Great. Absolutely outstanding from the Dutch government, to not let China dominate Europe however it wants.

Arguably the time to do that was in 2018, they could have blocked Nexperia from being aquired by Wingtech in the first place. But I supposed the second best time is now.

bgnn

2 hours ago

The same government forced NXP to sell its RF power division to Chinese JAC in 2015 due to NXP and Freescale merger. Isn't that great?

derelicta

30 minutes ago

Okay. Now do that for most major Dutch companies please.

grues-dinner

10 hours ago

Sell your industry to private equity, this is what happens. Someone who values it will take it up. Many such cases.

piskov

13 hours ago

> extraordinary move to ensure a sufficient supply of its chips remains available in Europe amid rising global trade tensions.

It’s like they beg China to do something with Taiwan.