wvbdmp
4 months ago
Unfortunately, WebSmell-o-Vision has not yet been unilaterally pushed by the dudes at Google to do this news justice, but as a croissant connaisseur I would have at least appreciated a webp of the thing instead of some random archive image. It’s a stamp, for christ’s sake.
There is a pic here and it’s quite nice imo: https://www.wopa-plus.com/en/stamps/product/&pid=105515
bogzz
4 months ago
I'm holding out for a <smell> HTML tag.
_kb
4 months ago
And of course the `olfactoryFactory` component for Enterprise™ frameworks.
layer8
4 months ago
function olfactory() {
return document.createElement("ol");
}user
4 months ago
user
4 months ago
classified
4 months ago
I bet the next version of Chrome will have that.
user
4 months ago
JumpCrisscross
4 months ago
<bouquet>
ben_w
4 months ago
Which any English person over 40 will spell <bucket> for reasons that likely make no sense to anyone outside the country.
ghssds
4 months ago
I can't wait for nasa.gov to let everybody smell Uranus.
gerdesj
4 months ago
Have a chat with your dog
user
4 months ago
carbocation
4 months ago
Friendly counterpoint (I know, not actually responsive to your comment, but tangentially related): https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade4401
squigz
4 months ago
Has there ever been any sort of even-remotely-successful smell-o-vision? We can recreate input for many of our other senses - music, visuals, touch - so why not smell?
nativeit
4 months ago
Presumably the volatility inherent to “volatile chemicals” makes it challenging to reproduce on-demand. I’d imagine you’d need something like dozens of base compounds, alcohols and acids to create esters and carrier media, some way of protecting all of it from oxygen, a hyper-accurate mixing device that can then by hyper-cleaned between each scent, since our noses would be too sensitive to allow even a small amount of cross-contamination…and then, why stop at smell? You basically already have everything you need for taste as well. Insert some lab-grown tissues and/or fibers, and we’ve invented the Star Trek replicator!
estimator7292
4 months ago
Ish. Our level of technology is limited to mixing a small set of base compounds on demand. That gives a range of possible scents about as small as you'd think. The problem is that your sense of smell is a complex chemical detector. There are a lot of unique molecules that you can detect.
We'd have to synthesize molecules on demand to get any reasonable range of scents, basically.
refurb
4 months ago
Back in the 1980s, there was a movie that was released where you could purchase a scratch and sniff card. It was dubbed “Odorama”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyester_(film)
As the movie played, a number would flash on the screen, you’d scratch that number and smell the spot on the card.
amelius
4 months ago
It's kinda odd that the first sense that evolution gave us will be the last we can record/playback using our devices.
usr1106
4 months ago
But wopa-plus does even mention the essential detail?
xattt
4 months ago
Here I was misreading the article that it was croissant-shaped, not scented, until I saw a picture.
valeena
4 months ago
I was initially reading that it was a croissant with a stamp scent and I was confused...
tempodox
4 months ago
I can almost smell breakfast…
amelius
4 months ago
Yes, we also need a cappuccino smell stamp.