Thank you for this, this is a kathartic read among a sea of "he just liked free speech and all ideas should be considered" has anyone read the sources mentionned ? do you recommend them ?

Predictable of his character, Krugman displays moral weakness and endangers progress by giving into his rage to lecture a man who can no longer talk back. Due to the heinous actions of a person whose politics Krugman sympathizes with.

Normal people do not reflexively respond to an assassination with an attempt to rhetorically bury the victim, after feigning offense at the accusation that the shooter shared his politics.

The guilty might. The radicalized might.

No, Paul, holding your political party accountable for its immense guilt is not exploitation. Its morally necessary for this country to move forward.

The Nation will not recover with voices like Krugman leading whatever healing might be possible.