A joint statement from OpenAI and Microsoft

37 pointsposted 14 hours ago
by davidbarker
(openai.com)

23 Comments

_alternator_

13 hours ago

Wow that’s opaque. Full text:

> OpenAI and Microsoft have signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding (MOU) for the next phase of our partnership. We are actively working to finalize contractual terms in a definitive agreement. Together, we remain focused on delivering the best AI tools for everyone, grounded in our shared commitment to safety.

stogot

13 hours ago

Was not there something in the hacker news guidelines about avoiding “announcements of future announcements” in the past? I don’t see it now

patapong

13 hours ago

The most interesting thing about this statement is probably the fact that they felt it was neccesary to make such a statement.

digdugdirk

13 hours ago

Right? Very much a vibe of, "Your mother and I wanted to let you know that we'll be talking about our relationship soon. But we want you to know that we'll always love you."

I don't know what that means, but also was that ever a concern I should have had before?

pwarner

9 hours ago

Is someone else launching something next week?

freehorse

11 hours ago

I was expecting they would announce reaching agi :(

tech234a

13 hours ago

Here is the same statement posted on Microsoft's website: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2025/09/11/a-joint-statemen...

alamzin

12 hours ago

Not completely the same. On OpenAI‘s site it begins with "OpenAI and Microsoft" and on Microsoft‘s with "Microsoft and OpenAI" :)

maxbond

12 hours ago

A proof by example that equality does not imply identity.

hulitu

6 hours ago

> A proof by example that equality does not imply identity.

In this case, is the opposite.

maxbond

5 hours ago

Hmm? Semantically they are equivalent ("this is the same statement"), bytewise they are not identical ("not completely the same"). Both parent comments are true statements. Things can be in the same equivalence class without being identical. What am I missing?

htrp

12 hours ago

They are going to couples counseling.

SilverElfin

10 hours ago

What’s the point of making the statement? Avoiding legal or regulatory consequences for anti competitiveness or for the exploitation of tax free growth as a nonprofit?

titmouselucifer

11 hours ago

I asked the chatgpt box at the bottom of the screen for additional details, and I think it was lying to me.

user

10 hours ago

[deleted]

ChrisArchitect

10 hours ago

Is this some kind of investor-pressured reaction to the supposed Oracle deal? Not sure the exact nature of things but would think some ppl were getting some calls yesterday.

happa

13 hours ago

Who caved?

zb3

12 hours ago

TLDR?

maxbond

12 hours ago

Microsoft has tentatively agreed to invest $100B+ into OpenAI's corporate arm. There is not yet a firm, binding agreement. OpenAI says it will remain a nonprofit + public benefit corporation and describes itself as a "philanthropic organization." They're soliciting applications for a $50M pool of grants for things like AI education and "community innovation."

Woodi

6 hours ago

Still a infomess :>

Looks like OpenAI dropped Azure in favor of Oracle but MS still invests B's $ ?

And OpenAI is a "non-profit" so Oracle strait get 75% or more of OpenAI fees ?

All that strange bilions just like in ad tech... Why manager pay so much bilions ?? It must be managers, who else it can be ? Except govs ofc :)

freehorse

12 hours ago

It is literally 3 sentences ffs