Ask HN: Can "Pull Request to Get Hired" Replace Traditional Tech Hiring?

3 pointsposted a day ago
by jerawaj740

Item id: 44544837

6 Comments

leakycap

a day ago

You communicate a lot to potential hires about your company in the way you recruit. I would opt myself out of the hiring pool if I noticed a company had a practice like this.

"Do some free work for us and we'll think about if we want to pay you for more" is a dystopian way of hiring that expects the job market to provide a perfect fit with no investment by the company.

I would wage salary suffers somewhere that is focusing on this type of recruitment, because it's focusing on the non-growth side of the problem. Focus your energy where you can build yourself and others up to find success, especially in hiring.

rvz

21 hours ago

> I would opt myself out of the hiring pool if I noticed a company had a practice like this.

You might as also opt out of any company telling you to do a take-home challenge or even a mindless leetcode puzzle that you have to solve for free as a wasted proof of work to the employer to hire you for.

Pull request + bounties are much better since you get paid when you solve the issue and comma.ai does this where regular contributors are easily identified, paid and have the chance to be hired.

I think comma.ai, George Hotz self-driving company is doing something like that. He has previously posted about hiring contributors. They way they do it is that they offer bounties [0] for fixing bugs or issues of different sizes. They also seem to have design challenges which offer paid rewards as well.

[0] comma.ai/bounties

benoau

21 hours ago

If the job was as simple as submitting pull requests, sure, but there's usually a lot more process and social-overhead that candidates need to fit in with too.

spooneybarger

a day ago

I would never hire someone solely on the basis of a PR.