Intel CEO says it's "too late" for them to catch competition

3 pointsposted 14 hours ago
by roody15

7 Comments

xscott

12 hours ago

I don't see why Intel couldn't make high end PCI cards that do super fast matrix multiplications and activation functions. Glue that together with a C-API and Python bindings.

For all the interesting concepts in CUDA, it seems like gamers want pixels and polygons, and neural networks want gemm/relu. It doesn't seem like Nvidia really has a moat that others (Tenstorrent?) can't cross.

bearjaws

13 hours ago

M1 was the canary in the coal mine. Apple went from making cell phone CPUs to an Intel destroying generation of CPUs in 6 years.

Personally I use a MBP for dev, at work I am required to use a Intel PC. I loathe my work laptop for being slower and having sleep issues.

My 265H Intel laptop sounds like a jet engine at all times, runs slower than my M4 Max, and only cost $500 less than the MBP.

roody15

9 hours ago

Absolutely agree. Here we are in 2025 and intel really doesn’t have an answer for the M1 which came out in 2020. A 600$ M1 MacBook Air has better performance / battery than most 1500$ plus intel laptops that are brand new. It’s honestly kind of sad.

protimewaster

13 hours ago

> only cost $500 less than the MBP.

That feels like a big difference? I think $500 is more than I've ever paid for a laptop.

apothegm

11 hours ago

Then you’re buying very low end laptops. For anyone who wants performance — be it for gaming or compiling or video production or 3D rendering or LLMs - $500 is a very low budget.

(Also, I must be old because I can remember a time when even the cheapest laptop cost about $2k.)

protimewaster

9 hours ago

I dunno about that, at least for gaming. I routinely see older model, but still perfectly capable, gaming laptops for $550 or less, on deals websites like Slickdeals. And I know that's more than $500, but not by much.

You can find deals on PC laptops much, much easier than Macs.

user

13 hours ago

[deleted]