quantified
2 days ago
Regardless of the outcome, we will still need to train with and use these weapons so long as adversaries are willing to do so. Otherwise we will simply lose.
Unless new tech like drones obviate them, analogous to how guns made armor obsolete.
zug_zug
a day ago
Well obviously if it's harmful for people they'll find way to reduce the intensity of the shockwaves.
Compared to inventing the LCD that's child's play.
sokoloff
2 days ago
Absolutely the armed forces need to train with and use these. The intent of the study is (presumably) to figure out how to train more safely by understanding the impact, choosing smart limits, and educating leaders and medics as to the symptoms to look out for.
t-3
2 days ago
For certain values of "we". For nuclear-armed states the threat of invasion is 0 and there's no danger of losing anything more substantial than face and whatever they've invested in foreign adventures.
quantified
2 days ago
Israel is nuclear-armed. They seem pretty concerned about invasion. Nukes are a very large hammer and your toe might be too close for comfort. The US is more expeditionary, anyway. So long as Mexico is kept weak and Canada friendly, invasion isn't a worry. But we have allies and friends all over the place.
conception
2 days ago
Who are they concerned about invading them?
quantified
21 hours ago
Besides Syria, Lebanon, and Egypt? I'm not Jewish, but they seem to be concerned about their existence.
t-3
16 hours ago
Israel has currently invaded both Syria and Lebanon, they are obviously not very afraid of them.
protonbob
2 days ago
Most soldiers wear ceramic armor. But I know that’s not what you many.
quantified
19 hours ago
Now they do, certainly. I should have mentioned that it has taken hundreds of years to create effective armor for the more common calibers.