kbelder
7 months ago
They should just double down on banning grants with racist/sexist/etc application... which was always illegal anyway, everybody just looked the other way. That would get rid of the objectionable parts of DEI.
Judge: You can't ban DEI grants without bothering to define DEI
21 pointsposted 7 months ago
by bundie6 Comments
motorest
7 months ago
From the article.
> So, while the decision restores money to individual research programs, it does nothing to reverse the larger damage caused by the politicization of funding decisions.
ggm
7 months ago
"I know it when I see it"
vanderZwan
7 months ago
That doesn't work when dealing with people who are arguing in bad faith that the card says moops
torbid
7 months ago
It doesn't work at all, Potter Stewart wasn't stupid or uninformed about what a secular republic is, so he was acting in bad faith to push for personal discretion definitions that will mostly be performed by people in the majority faith.
vanderZwan
7 months ago
Well that too, but I guess my point is that it works even less now.