rahimnathwani
8 days ago
Note: StarVector models will not work for natural images or illustrations, as they have not been trained on those images. They excel in vectorizing icons, logotypes, technical diagrams, graphs, and charts.
8 days ago
Note: StarVector models will not work for natural images or illustrations, as they have not been trained on those images. They excel in vectorizing icons, logotypes, technical diagrams, graphs, and charts.
12 days ago
This would be absolutely GREAT for generating icons for applications!
(Also would make a great SaaS... for $X/month ($9.95, $19.95, ??.??) generate unlimited icons...)
Congrats to the team for their pioneering hard work in this nascent area of LLM/Transformer research!
Well done!
7 days ago
No it won't (most likely). VTracer (which the authors compare with) is fast, runs in browser via wasm, consumes way less resources and can even convert natural images very decently. But the model seems cool for the usecase of prompt to logo or icon (over my current workflow of getting a jpg from flux and passing it through VTracer). I hope someone over at llama.cpp notices this (at least for the text-to-svg usecase, if not multimodal).
7 days ago
Did anyone else notice - the molecule it generated did not match the source image.
Seems like this could be incredibly valuable, but I'd argue there needs to be validation steps in place to confirm it's actually generating the right thing, for the case of image -> vector generation.
7 days ago
...you are the validator
8 days ago
I've been waiting for someone to make something like this! Perfect.
12 days ago
Horray. Code is released