> the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group
Trumpism has a very clear culture, using that definition.
But it seems like you're not using that definition. Perhaps you're using the second one in Merriam-Webster?
> enlightenment and excellence of taste acquired by intellectual and aesthetic training
People self-identifying as this type of "cultured" is just another example of the smugness I'm complaining about. There's also not much to argue about here, there's no way to falsify such a claim, it's just self-annointed "enlightenment and excellence". Some folks on Bluesky define "enlightenment and excellence" in ways that align with their attributes, some folks on X/Twitter define it differently to align with theirs. And they're all smug about it.
You are being weirdly abstract and defining yourself as the victim of smugness, while not bringing any counter-examples, or even a theory of an alternate culture.
The only weird thing here is your “my enemies have no culture” theory, which could not be a more transparent case of bubble blindness.
Counterexamples? Or, what am I blind to? You are trying to pick a fight about "bubble blindness" or something without any example of what I supposedly do not see. Yes, that is strangely abstract.