mountainriver
10 hours ago
Bluesky is actually a lot of fun right now!
gniting
10 hours ago
Yeah. Spending time here over the past few days. Seems less... toxic
10 hours ago
Bluesky is actually a lot of fun right now!
10 hours ago
Yeah. Spending time here over the past few days. Seems less... toxic
9 hours ago
It certainly seems like he was a contributor to said toxicity.
9 hours ago
What’s preventing Bluesky from eventually getting all the same trolls and being just as toxic?
8 hours ago
It has better moderation tools; it will likely get all the same trolls, but you won't have to look at them if you don't want to. In particular, mass-blocking is a first-class feature (it never was on Twitter, and then Musk's API and other changes broke it almost completely).
8 hours ago
The fact that it's not run by a "free speech absolutist" who actually just wants to see more conservative attacks on liberals on the platform.
7 hours ago
Or to rephrase "who wants to see the platform not limited to attacks on conservatives only"
4 hours ago
They’re actively censoring liberals. First amendment rights my ass.
12 minutes ago
I would be interested to see the evidence that liberals are being censored *MORE* than Republicans. No doubt many people of all political stripes are being kicked off or censored on the platform for a variety of reasons. And the left-wing media will be amplifying things when it's happening to liberals.
8 hours ago
Nothing, they're already showing up just to own the libs.
9 hours ago
Stephan King leaving will help X become less toxic. Seems like a win for those who want a less toxic X.
8 hours ago
Twitter has been a cesspool ever since Musk bought it. It wasn’t great before, but now - yeesh.
Looks like he’s not the only one, the Grauniad newspaper announced [1] they’re leaving too a couple of days ago, because (wait for it) it’s toxic as hell.
‘The US presidential election campaign served only to underline what we have considered for a long time: that X is a toxic media platform and that its owner, Elon Musk, has been able to use its influence to shape political discourse.’
You might say: “X is right at the center of all things toxic”
1: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/nov/13/why-the-guardi...
7 hours ago
My point is that Stephen King is partially responsible for the increase in toxicity. Instead of being the change he wanted to see, he just made the platform worse in the exact way he was complaining about.
He comes off as a hypocrite and it isn't a good look for him. If you think toxicity is bad and is ruining the platform then don't be toxic.
an hour ago
I didn't think he was so bad though I guess toxicity is in the eye of the beholder. He mostly slagged Trump / the republican party.
8 hours ago
You can’t just say “no you” every time you’re criticized for something.
8 hours ago
Ordinarily I would agree, but Stephen King is a no holds barred shitbait poster. Not that there is anything inherently reprehensible about that, but then leaving for toxicity just seems self-unaware.
7 hours ago
I wasn't criticized for anything. I don't have a Twitter account and only view posts when somebody links it or send it to me.
10 hours ago
I think that we should all put this nonsense down and:
Just
Go
Outside
9 hours ago
After deleting my instagram and Snapchat accounts I’ve realized that life isn’t too shabby. :)
8 hours ago
yeah, got rid of FB years ago... was a good choice.
5 hours ago
I'm literally "sittin' on the dock of the bay" with my relaxed dog sipping a hot tea watching the ferries leave. He doesn't even know what X is.
12 hours ago