I couldn't find any gguf files yet. Looking forward to trying it out when they're available.

Phi 3.5 is pretty bad in practice, the Phi series always benchmarks well on the popular benchmarks and then falls over IRL (or on less-popular benchmarks). It would be nice to see it against Qwen2.5, but the Qwen team didn't release any evals on the 7B version AFAIK, so I can see why the Zamba folks compared it against other published benchmarks of similar-sized models.

In general the idea with these hybrid SSM architectures is to show that you can get good results with fewer training tokens, and to significantly improve inference speed. Even if Qwen2.5 was better at MMLU, etc, it definitely used way more training tokens to get there (18T tokens for Qwen2.5 vs 3T for Zamba2), so Zamba2 is still a pretty useful result.

TBD if Zamba2 is actually good in real world usage (Phi3.5 for example used only 3.4T tokens and got good public benchmark results, it's just not very good at anything other than the public benchmarks), but Jamba1.5 -- another hybrid SSM architecture -- did seem to do quite well on the LMSys leaderboards (which are admittedly these days not a super effective measure, but still feel less gameable than MMLU), so I'm moderately hopeful that this is a real architectural win and not just gamed benchmarks.

I think it cannot surpass SOTA in some LM evaluation sets, but please understand that achieving better results requires a very good training dataset, which not everyone can afford.

On the other hand, the main points of Zamba/Mamba are low latency, generation speed, and efficient memory usage. If this is true, LLMs could be much easier for everyone to use. All we need to do is wait for someone with a good training dataset to train a SOTA Mamba.

Please someone correct me if I’m wrong, but my understanding of ML/LLMs is that this kind of hand crafting has been tried, but it is easier to train/less finicky to let behavior like this emerge from more data, see [1] “Bitter Lesson” and [2] “Scaling Laws”.

MAMBA as an architecture claims to have some significant gains performance wise, but to my knowledge there haven't been any really large models (>~100B params) with open weights/leaked MAMBA architecture been disclosed other than this (7B).

As mentioned by other comments, another dimension not to forget is the training data quality. Not only quantity but also quality really matters, is what we are learning more and more with LLMs..

[1] http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html [2] see eg https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5eqRuVp65eY&pp=ygUMU2NhbGluZyB... for a well made/easily digestable intro

From the article: "We release the model weights open-source (Apache 2.0)".

https://huggingface.co/spaces/Zyphra/Zamba2-7B

Here's a chat interface

https://maia.zyphra.com/chat

Since it looks like from the announcement, the model hasn't changed much, here's the Zamba 1 paper for reference: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.16712

Zamba 1 has a single shared attention block that is applied every 6 Mamba blocks. For Zamba 2: "Instead of a single shared attention block, we utilize two shared attention blocks which are interleaved in an ABAB pattern throughout the network."

Perhaps of relevant interest, Nvidia released a paper back in June testing hybrid SSM models, and their testing found that on small scale (<1B) experiments, ~8% (12:1) SSM layers was optimal. https://research.nvidia.com/publication/2024-06_empirical-st...

The 8B param/3.5T token model they trained, Mamba2-Hybrid, was also Apache 2.0 licensed: https://huggingface.co/nvidia/mamba2-hybrid-8b-3t-128k

Tri Gao and Albert Gu say "Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Duality"

https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.21060

Mamba-2 is used in Zamab2.

On the page it states:

Our novel shared-attention architecture allows more parameters to be allocated to the Mamba2 backbone. In turn, the shared transformer block preserves the rich cross-sequence dependencies of the attention computation.

so sounds like it is transformer based?

> 35 times during his career

Not to diminish his world records, but professional athletes frequently hold their performance back so they can set more world records, especially if they have sponsorship deals that include getting paid per world record.

> By 1992, he was no longer bound to the Soviet system, and signed a contract with Nike that rewarded each world record performance with special bonuses of $40,000

He could have just done it a couple of times, by really pushing the limit each time, but he most likely instead spread it out over more times.

I don't think that's what's happening in the AI ecosystem right now :)

ϕ-3 isn't in the 7B league.

State of the art models aren't trained the same way as the first models were. High quality datasets are both much more valuable and more useful than simply feeding everything you could possibly crawl into it. Throwing in the kitchen sink and then some is a great way to burn money while also hurting your model accuracy.

How is this related?