9 months ago
> X responded by blocking links to the material, claiming that it contained sensitive personal information such as the Ohio US senator’s social security number, and banned Klippenstein from the platform.
That seems like a crucial detail that Guardian could have verified. Is it possible that they know the validity of that claim but chose not to mention it in the article?
9 months ago
He redacted it and they still wouldn't allow it[0].
9 months ago
Silly rabbit. It's free speech for me, not for thee.
9 months ago
9 months ago
[dead]
9 months ago
[flagged]
9 months ago
That happened before the election, though? Like, Greenwald quit in October 2020. How could you say it was the administration when he wasn't in office?
It's deeply misleading for you to write that because it implies he was abusing governmental power when he was just a regular private citizen.
9 months ago
The Biden administration did no such thing. The Biden administration assumed office in 2021, and the Hunter Biden laptop story was published in 2020.