3np
13 hours ago
Looks like it works offline/client-side and doesn't perform any online/on-chain validation. Which is preferred if possible. Would be nice if the page explained what form of validation specifically is being performed. Currently it is not obvious what valid/invalid means in context.
What is the source of the "scam reported" addresses currently?
Are you planning to also publish sources?
moonbay42
9 hours ago
Thank you for your feedback and suggestions.
We completely agree with your point that providing more information about the validation process is indeed important. We plan to write a detailed article explaining our validation logic and display it prominently on the website. This will help users better understand what specifically "valid" and "invalid" mean in our context.
I'd like to clarify our approach to determining valid and invalid addresses. Our validation mechanism is primarily based on checking the legitimacy of addresses according to the specific rules of each blockchain network. Every blockchain has its own unique address format and validation rules. Currently, we have implemented address validation for several major blockchain networks, including: 1. Ethereum (ETH) 2. TRON (TRX) 3. Binance Smart Chain (BSC) 4. Omni Layer 5. BEP-2
Regarding the source of "scam reported" addresses, we currently rely on a limited dataset from user feedback. However, we are actively expanding our data sources. In the near future, we plan to integrate multiple reliable APIs such as the scamsearch API and chainabuse API. This will significantly increase the comprehensiveness and accuracy of our data.
Thank you again for your feedback. Your opinions are invaluable for our continuous product improvement.