Beijinger
a year ago
Dogs have been buried even by human hunters millennials ago. Sometime with a last bone in its mouth for the passage to the afterlife.
The dog lived between 25,000 and 24,000 BC.... https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/what-makes-us-human/...
Frederick the Great, King of Prussia, lies buried beside his dogs, as requested in his testament. I have lived as a philosopher and wish to be buried as such, without circumstance, without solemn pomp, without splendour. I want to be neither opened nor embalmed. Bury me in Sanssouci at the level of the terraces in a tomb which I have had prepared for myself…
JumpCrisscross
a year ago
> Frederick the Great, King of Prussia, lies buried beside his dogs
There is a massive difference between being buried with slaves, pets and trinkets and having a burial for one.
lostlogin
a year ago
So I guess you’re against having your wife sit on your funeral pyre too?
RandomThoughts3
a year ago
I will hasard that yes, they are against. The practice is barbaric. I still fail to see how it relates to their very valid comment that having your dogs buried next to you as their owner is fundamentaly different that having a burial for your dog.
Beijinger
a year ago
As far as I know, the dogs were not killed but were buried there before their master died.
JumpCrisscross
a year ago
> the dogs were not killed but were buried there before their master died
Sure. There is still a massive difference between a burial for a King having someone or something buried with them and conducting the ritual entirely for a pet. (And looping back to OP, several cultures conducted funeral rites entirely for beloved pets. The Egyptians and Romans come to mind.)
whtsthmttrmn
a year ago
Forgive my ignorance, but is the difference because a burial FOR a dog implies some meaningful significance since the focus is on the pet, whereas being buried WITH the dogs is just a way for the dogs to be sent to the afterlife with the deceased (and the focus isn't on them, they're just along for the ride)?
collingreen
a year ago
Yes. The one is focused on the pet, elevating it to the same level of respect and dignity as funeral rites for people.
The other is not - it could be respectful (I loved my pet please bury them by me) or not (bury my jewels and slaves with me) but it still isn't the raising of the pet status to that of your own species.