bko
5 hours ago
I've written about this before as my home state of NJ enforced a similar ban a little while ago. In our case, they banned paper bags as well!
It all points to a larger question: who is writing these laws?? It's such an anti-human law. It makes your life considerably worse off in a noticeable way. And it doesn't actually reduce waste, but makes things worse. Here is a few things that happened:
- Reusable bags have to be reused dozens of times to make up for the additional environmental impact, so damage likely went up
- People have to pay more to buy more expensive plastic bags to carry their goods that are ironically also wrapped in plastic.
- Whole Foods home delivery had to send you more sturdy and expensive "reusable" bags. Just what the typical Whole Foods home delivery patron needs, about a dozen reusable bags delivered to them every week
- People started stealing hand held shopping baskets
It really doesn't bode well for the political process that politicians can force these ham fisted reactionary laws at a considerably cost to nearly all denizens for absolutely no purpose.
https://mleverything.substack.com/p/new-jersey-bans-paper-ba...
https://mleverything.substack.com/p/an-update-on-new-jerseys...
muwtyhg
4 hours ago
> - Reusable bags have to be reused dozens of times to make up for the additional environmental impact, so damage likely went up
Damage to what? The bags? The food? The environment? I don't understand why bags built to be re-used is a bad thing.
> - People have to pay more to buy more expensive plastic bags to carry their goods that are ironically also wrapped in plastic.
If the food already being wrapped in plastic is a factor in how we bag the food, why do we need plastic bags at all? I don't see how this is relevant at all.
> - Whole Foods home delivery had to send you more sturdy and expensive "reusable" bags. Just what the typical Whole Foods home delivery patron needs, about a dozen reusable bags delivered to them every week
This seems easily solvable with a "return extra bags" feature. If you're getting delivery, the delivery man will be back next week. Why can't he pick them up then?
> - People started stealing hand held shopping baskets
Well before the current bag ban, most of the stores near me (California) had done away with shopping baskets. People stealing/taking them has been a thing forever and they constantly need to be replenished (same with shopping carts).
> Here is how many times you would have to reuse a bag to have equal global warming impact:
The bag ban is not to combat global warming. It's about the plastic bags that do not make it to the landfill. They end up in waterways and on plants and inside or on the faces of animals. I don't think I've ever heard of one of these bills arguing to get rid of single-use bags for global warming or landfill reasons. It's almost always an anti-litter measure.
bgirard
3 hours ago
> Damage to what? The bags? The food? The environment? I don't understand why bags built to be re-used is a bad thing.
The environment. Reusable bags consume more resources to produce. So if you buy a reusable bag and throw it out, it's a net loss to the environment. If enough people are buying a resuable bag because they're not carrying around their reusable bags every time they buy something, it becomes a net lost because you're displacing cheap plastics bag (that are somewhat resuable) by more resource intensive resuable bags that don't get reused.
bko
2 hours ago
> Damage to what? The bags? The food? The environment? I don't understand why bags built to be re-used is a bad thing.
Any damage done by throwing away a one time use plastic bag is multiplied by throwing away a "reusable" plastic bag. People want one time plastic bags and they'll use reusable plastic bags like one time if you force them. These bags are built to be tougher so are more expensive, more carbon intensive to produce, stay around longer in landfills, [insert bad metric of plastic bag]
> If the food already being wrapped in plastic is a factor in how we bag the food, why do we need plastic bags at all? I don't see how this is relevant at all.
Because there is already plastic bags everywhere so its a farce to declare "plastic is okay in every part of the process except this final part".
> This seems easily solvable with a "return extra bags" feature. If you're getting delivery, the delivery man will be back next week. Why can't he pick them up then?
Because it costs them money, and effort and gasoline to do so and then they have to clean them and recycle them. It sounds like a nightmare and a huge liability to do so. No offense, but I imagine you don't have any experience in recycling or operations of a food chain. It's like someone telling an engineer "why don't they just make code unhackable"
> Well before the current bag ban, most of the stores near me (California) had done away with shopping baskets. People stealing/taking them has been a thing forever and they constantly need to be replenished (same with shopping carts).
Great consumers don't even have to option to steal shopping carts. I guess they can work on balancing food on their head. Problem solved.
> The bag ban is not to combat global warming. It's about the plastic bags that do not make it to the landfill. They end up in waterways and on plants and inside or on the faces of animals. I don't think I've ever heard of one of these bills arguing to get rid of single-use bags for global warming or landfill reasons. It's almost always an anti-litter measure.
This seems like cutting off your nose to spite your face. How about you figure out how to get people not to pollute or to clean things up rather than just prevent them from having things that are super convenient.
gs17
5 hours ago
>Just what the typical Whole Foods home delivery patron needs, about a dozen reusable bags delivered to them every week
Really, it seems like the service should also be able to pick up all the extra bags if you leave them on your door or something. Retail Whole Foods (sometimes, apparently it varies by location) gives you a discount if you bring your own bag, delivery could have a similar option for returning the reusable bags.
bgirard
3 hours ago
They really should but they don't. In my area I get Walmart to deliver my food and they just outsource to whatever gig service they want like Uber/DoorDash. And they're just not equipped to deal with the bag return. For a full grocery order I get a bunch of reusable bags every week that I just simply can't use. I hate it honestly. Now it's clogging up my garbage.
tacticalturtle
3 hours ago
You seem to be looking at environmental impact based on carbon footprint, or whether the bags end up in the ocean- but that’s not the limit of the environmental impact.
The plastic bags break down into microplastic particles, which makes its way into our intestines, lungs and reproductive systems:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-02968-x
We don’t know what we’re doing to our bodies here - it might be nothing, but I think it’s completely justified to pump the brakes regardless of carbon impacts.
Paper bag bans, I’ll grant you, seem pretty silly.
jjtheblunt
3 hours ago
> - Reusable bags have to be reused dozens of times to make up for the additional environmental impact, so damage likely went up
patagonia makes or at least in 2010 made reusable grocery bags from spare ripstop nylon from recycled garments (or spare material). i've got to say, they're the best @$%^ing grocery bags...they fold into a wallet sized pouch too. though i get your point, it took like a day to prefer these to paper and plastic.
lotsofpulp
5 hours ago
Banning across the board is stupid. In Washington state, you can buy plastic bags for $0.08. Enough to incentivize most people to bring their own bag, not enough to cause adverse consequences because a bag is only $0.08 in the event you don’t bring a bag.
jjtheblunt
3 hours ago
Arizona same story (but $0.10). works great really, in that reusable bags are pretty robust, after 12+ years of using them myself. when i space out and forget, i blow a dime or two. convenience in versatility.
ssl-3
5 hours ago
Who decides that a bag is worth $0.08, and where does that $0.08 go when a bag is purchased?
lotsofpulp
5 hours ago
The cost of the bag has to be $0.08 plus sales tax at minimum.
https://ecology.wa.gov/waste-toxics/reducing-recycling-waste...
> Where does the 8-cent fee on paper and reusable bags go?
>Businesses collect and keep the entire 8 cents to recover some of the cost of providing the bags and to incentivize customers to bring their own reusable bags. The charge must be shown as a taxable sale on the receipt provided to the customer. Businesses may choose to charge more than 8 cents per bag.
My above comment is technically incorrect because there is an across the board ban on thin, single use plastic bags. But it’s not super inconvenient or costly to have to pay $0.08 (the only price for bags I have ever seen).
However, that price might go up in the future because the regulations call for even thicker bags in Jan 2026, which I did not know.
> In January 2026, the minimum thickness requirement will increase from 2.25 mil to 4 mil.
jerlam
3 hours ago
> even thicker bags in Jan 2026
One of the nice things about the older "non-reusable" bags was that they were so thin that you could wad them up in a pocket, they would be unnoticeable, and you could always have it on your person. The thicker bags require careful folding and even so, take up a lot more space.