Slightly offtopic, but any chance you could update or re-upload code for your https://github.com/harvardnlp/DeepLatentNLP tutorial? I found the NLP latent variable models discussed there really interesting, and notebooks were excellent. However, these seem gone and the only thing left are slides?

Alternatively, any other places that discuss the same topics, including some code? I could only find equivalent discussions with code in Pyro docs and Kevin Murphy's book, volume 2. But these are more sparse as they also cover many other topics.

Thanks a lot, Sasha, for creating these. I found your LLM training puzzles to be excellent as well.

Thanks Sasha - this looks like a great resource.Just to be clear, would you recommend going through other newer resources than this instead?

Not sure if your comment is to discourage someone from going through this.

Do you have links to the other great resources you are referring to?

Wow, thank you! I've been wanting to learn about GPUs on my next flight, and this is the perfect material for that.

all videos should be available on YT by end of month

I've always felt like the best interactive educational model for forming a good intuition on how to maximize throughput and minimize worst-case latency in a pipelined parallel dataflow system (e.g. DSPs, FPGAs, GPUs, or even distributed message-passing systems) would be some variant of the game Factorio. Specifically, one with:

1. instead of buildings, IP cores doing processing steps;

2. instead of belts, wires — which take up far less than one tile, so many can run together along one tile and many can connect to a single IP core; where each wire can move its contents at arbitrary speed (including "stopped") — but where this will have a power-use cost proportional to the wire's speed;

3. an overall goal of optimizing for rocket launches per second per power-usage watt. (Which should overall require minimizing the amount of stuff moving around across the whole base, avoiding pipeline stalls; doing as much parallel batching as possible; etc.)

(Yes, I know Shenzhen I/O exists. It's great for what it does — modelling signals and signal transformations — but it doesn't model individual packets of data as moving along wires with propagation delay, and with the potential for e.g. parallel-line interference given a bad encoding scheme, quantum tunnelling, overclocking or undervolting components, etc. I think a Factorio-variant would actually be much more flexible to implement these aspects.)

Here is a port without the visualizer:

https://twitter.com/srush_nlp/status/1719376959572980094

Here is an amazing in-browser implementation in WebGPU

https://www.answer.ai/posts/2024-09-12-gpupuzzles.html

Thanks so much!

maybe try out[local_i, local_j] ?

It’s not about brute force, but about trying to do the exact same calculation on every thread. Efficiency in numpy or on a GPU comes from avoiding “divergence”, which is what it’s called on a GPU when some threads execute different instructions than other threads in the same thread group. If one thread executes a unique instruction, all the other threads have to stall and wait for it. If all the threads execute unique blocks, the waiting becomes catastrophic and slower than single-theaded code. But if they all do the same thing, the machine will fly. Sometimes avoiding divergence means doing things that seem counter-intuitive compared to CPU single-threaded code, which is why it has a reputation for being brute force, but really it’s just a different set of efficiency tricks.

It is true that you don’t have to worry as much about repeating calculations. I think you’re referring to “rematerialization”, meaning after doing some non-trivial calculation once and using the result, throwing it away and redoing the same calculation again later on the same thread. It’s true this can sometimes be advantageous, mostly because memory use is so expensive. One load or store into VRAM can be as expensive as 10 or sometimes even 100 math instructions, so if your store & load takes 40 cycles, and recomputing something takes 25 cycles of math using registers, then recomputing can be faster.

I second the sibling recommendation to learn numpy, it’s a different way of thinking than single-threaded functional programming with lists & maps. Try writing some kind of image filter in Python both ways, and get a feel for the performance difference. If you’re familiar with Python, this is a one or two hour exercise. Last time I tried it, my numpy version was ~2 orders of magnitude faster than the lists & maps version.

One of the most fun ways to learn SIMD programming, in my humble opinion, is to study the shaders on ShaderToy. ShaderToy makes it super simple to write GPU code and see the result. Some of the tricks people use are very clever, but after studying them for a while and trying a few yourself, you’ll start to see themes emerge about how to organize parallel image computations.

I would recommend first learning Numpy or a similar vectorized library. If you have a good sense of those data structures (array broadcasting) it is a good starting point for what you can do in a GPU world.

Nope! Too hard for me. But it would be a great practice for someone who wants to get started in this space. There is a Triton implementation that might be a good starting place.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astigmatism

Maybe?

> pools are in dire need of cuda developers

Pools have money; if they need CUDA engineers, they are fully capable of hiring them at the industry rate.

Why? Wouldn't existing tools be about as good as they could be?