cedws
5 days ago
Seems like an obscene amount of computing power for a phone. Who is pushing their phone that hard? Majority of people just want to send/receive texts and scroll through Instagram.
forgetfulness
5 days ago
Instagram.
I was completely fine using a well-taken-care-of iPhone 8 until Instagram's input boxes became unusably slow on it, now I have an iPhone 13. I'm guessing that there'll be a race to make more powerful AI assistants, but makers of far more mundane apps will gobble up the computing power readily.
deaddodo
5 days ago
Instagram's web app drains my computer's battery / knocks it into performance mode.
It's obscene for a basic messaging and photo gallery site.
zamfi
5 days ago
What is it actually doing with all that compute? Is it every animated thumbnail? Is it scaling thumbnail images? Re-flowing the page 120x/sec? Mining bitcoin?
Anyone know?
the_snooze
5 days ago
Bloated JavaScript libraries and their bloated dependencies.
akomtu
5 days ago
Some sort of distributed face recognition offloaded to user devices?
codersfocus
5 days ago
Improving the developer experience
sofixa
5 days ago
> It's obscene for a basic messaging
That's an insult to basic messaging, I've seen better UX in tutorials on writing a chat application/website than the sorry excuse Instagram has. Same goes for their comments.
benhurmarcel
5 days ago
Reddit's mobile website also kills my battery and makes my iPhone hot. I have no idea how that's possible when they just display text.
innagadadavida
5 days ago
Part of move fast / break things culture. It also doesn’t help that Zuckerberg is trying hard to nit tightly integrate with native stack.
lofaszvanitt
5 days ago
Instagram and FB eats a lot of memory on desktop too. Actually, a LOT of memory. Lots of times OOM kicks in, although on Linux only.
piva00
5 days ago
FB is ridiculously unresponsive on my M3 Pro with a 1Gbps connection.
The UI feels janky and laggy, the Messenger itself has noticeable delays, loading new sections is palpably slow.
I cannot understand how, it's not an absurdly complex SPA doing a lot of computation on client-side, it just loads different modals and views.
On the other hand, a complex app doing loads on the client like Onshape, a CAD modeling webapp is very snappy, and satisfying to use.
I don't get how Meta's webapps can be this intensely heavy, even if heavily unoptimised.
wg0
5 days ago
React?
lofaszvanitt
4 days ago
React is steposhi level soft.
lofaszvanitt
4 days ago
Because they have to be stupid. Otherwise the "AUTHORITY" will come knocking. You are too smart, tone back, you have to look like stupid... per the invisible/unspoken rules.
World is fucked. And those who create these invisible rules must be carpet nuclear bombed out of this world.
piva00
4 days ago
I don't follow what you are alluding to, if it's content moderation you are reaching to I'd say that has absolutely nothing to do with how unresponsive the UI is, content moderation is not done client-side.
dzhiurgis
5 days ago
In a weird twist web app doesn’t have post privacy/visibility controls that actual app does.
deaddodo
5 days ago
The web app doesn't do 60% of what the app does, which is already barely anything.
wslh
5 days ago
That's exactly why I miss the Samsung DeX [1], it gave me the option to turn my mobile phone into a desktop, solving one choice problem. But, of course, there’s always another choice around the corner. I don’t even trust Linux in battery management, and while Chrome OS Flex [2] offers a decent alternative, in the end, I don’t miss notebooks and their battery-draining habits. I’ve learned to embrace the fruit… and its own ecosystem: iPhone + MacBook.
I expect someone will really wake up soon, but as long as companies like Microsoft continue to be cash cows, I don't think it'll happen anytime soon. Even if Qualcomm makes the chips, Microsoft Windows won’t handle the energy efficiently.
paulryanrogers
5 days ago
How were the thermals? I can't imagine doing anything CPU intense for more than a few seconds with how hot phones get.
wslh
5 days ago
I remember that the Samsung ~S21 was frequently hot beyond the DeX, comparing to iPhone.
Almondsetat
5 days ago
Seems like an obscene amount of computing power for a personal computer. Who is pushing their desktop that hard? Majority of people just want to send/receive emails and write a document.
jchw
5 days ago
I know this is meant to be sarcastic, but it's a perfectly reasonable point. Not only that, it already came true; a lot of the time compute power has become so plentiful that we're more concerned about battery life and efficiency than actual raw grunt in personal computers. The main exceptions are gamers and people who use productivity software, but let's face it: Grandma does not need a 7995WX to log into Facebook.
eesmith
5 days ago
You are not wrong. Don't most people have a desktop computer which is less powerful than an M1? That strengthens the original comment, yes?
decafninja
5 days ago
I’d go even further, at least anecdotally - most people don’t seem to have a desktop or even laptop computer these days.
Literally none of my non-techie circle own a personal desktop. Only a few own a personal laptop - and even then, it only gets turned on occasionally. Most of them do all their personal computing on an iPad or smartphone.
mlsu
5 days ago
My fiance takes a lot of videos on her phone. She has become a pretty talented video editor. Watching her “work” is actually a wild experience because it really is a whole different way of using a computer. She is comparably fast to someone on a desktop editor.
4K video editing — you need a pretty powerful desktop PC to smoothly edit/preview 4k video. CPU, GPU, and memory.
noncoml
5 days ago
You underestimate what people do with their phones these days
AR, CAD, Video Editing, games, etc..
Even just sending a video on WhatsApp requires transcoding
ahmedfromtunis
5 days ago
Exactly!
It's not my fault that you are underutilizing the incredible marvel of engineering that is your smartphone.
Reading and watching old sci-fi taught me to appreciate the technology I'm lucky to be in possession of and to take full advantage of it.
Video calls, gaming, AR... are very compute intensive and need every last transistor to perform well.
heraldgeezer
5 days ago
Yes I love gaming on my phone!! I love the feel of the inprecise touchscreen controls, the worse experience compared to a console or PC and all the ads and microtransactions!!
Anyone that can afford a new iphone and games should just get a console or PC... jesus.
noncoml
4 days ago
I have to agree. I enjoy games so much better now that I always carry on me my second PS5 and my 36” 4k monitor. I have trouble getting on planes however because they won’t allow my True Sine Wave UPS through security.
heraldgeezer
4 days ago
Heard of a real handheld console like Nintendo Switch? Or a handheld emulated one like an Anbernic? Maybe this tip will help you. Stay safe and be blessed :)
okdood64
5 days ago
troupo
5 days ago
I... already do all that on my iPhone 12 Pro, and people have been doing that for a while now.
For anything truly groundbreaking... Apple has too locked down of a system. And I say it as a long time fanboy
wmf
5 days ago
Apple showed several AAA games like Assassin's Creed running on iPhones.
jsheard
5 days ago
But approximately nobody actually bought them, which comes back to the point about all that compute power being a solution in search of a problem. People don't want to play AAA games on a phone.
https://mobilegamer.biz/under-2000-people-have-paid-to-play-...
ac29
5 days ago
Thats a lousy article. Its based on 3rd party estimates of sales of a game released only 2 weeks before the article date. And, its a 2017 console title released on iOS in 2024, so presumably most fans of the series had already played it (it was released on 8 platforms before iOS).
"AAA" is kinda a vague term, but there are definitely some big budget games on mobile that do massive numbers (hundreds of millions of dollars).
guidedlight
5 days ago
These aren’t games designed for touch devices. They are console games ported to iOS.
To play them you need to pair a controller, making the experience subpar.
zer0zzz
5 days ago
Even for the most mundane phone usage I find the faster and faster socs being better at driving mobile safari to keep up with desktop websites. That alone I think is worth periodically upgrading.
doublepg23
5 days ago
They can subsidize the costs of developing fast chips with iPhone margins and then use the faster chip tech in their computers.
samsolomon
5 days ago
I imagine at some point you’ll be able to take your phone to any screen and use it as a desktop computer. Obviously there are a lot of UI differences for touch vs keyboard interfaces, but it feels like that’s going to be the future at some point.
ein0p
5 days ago
They also take pictures and videos. That takes a ton of compute nowadays, with all the computational photography stuff going on in the background. Most laptops cannot do realtime processing and compression of 8K video.
mensetmanusman
5 days ago
I do. I can almost do my entire knowledge worker job from the phone. My 14 is getting slowed down by iOS Microsoft Office enhancements, so hopefully the 16 can make me just as productive as I was last year.
rvnx
5 days ago
LLM / Extracting objects from pictures / Generating pictures
cedws
5 days ago
Isn't all the AI stuff running on Neural Engine, which is a separate coprocessor?
Salgat
5 days ago
Depends, data preprocessing is often done on the CPU though.
morsch
5 days ago
Isn't almost all of the AI stuff running in the cloud on dedicated hardware, drawing power that would melt an iPhone?
dagw
5 days ago
The whole selling point of Apples AI stuff is that the processing for most things can be done on the phone and thus your private data won't have to leave you device
michaelmrose
5 days ago
Seems like the logical way to do that would be something like a mini without a monitor or keyboard plugged into your router.
I fully expect remote solutions to smoke local options and an ultimate transition to remote solutions.
dagw
5 days ago
I fully expect remote solutions to smoke local options
Once you include the all the network overhead of sending images/video files to a server and back over a not very fast connection, I suspect it will be closer than you think for most real world use cases. And even if a cloud solution can improved the overall performance from say 4 seconds to 2 seconds, I don't see that as a huge win overall.
All that being said Apple does also offer an AI cloud compute solutions for operation too heavy to run on the phone.
heyoni
5 days ago
Except what would have been a Mac mini plugged into your router is now handheld and way less janky than needing the user to maintain two separate devices.
michaelmrose
5 days ago
The phone doesn't have the memory/compute/cooling/or power budget to be a meaningful replacement for a desktop device which in turn doesn't hold a candle to the power or economy of doing it on the server side.
Herein privacy and utility are clearly in tension. The only sane thing to do is do it on the server but if you ARE going to do it locally doing it on a computer on the clients premises is the only way to actually do it because mobile devices power/compute/cooling/power budgets are so anemic whatever a synthetic benchmark says a device can do in the space of a moment or two.
I'm presuming that the ultimate strategy that a lot of players are going to actually follow is all server all the time wherein companies who are terribly concerned about privacy will rather than doing it locally do it on a server that they own.
heyoni
5 days ago
It doesn’t need to be a desktop. The point is they make their phones overpowered because nighttime operations while on a charger need that extra juice.
michaelmrose
5 days ago
The point of this subthread is directly and only in regards to AI. The original comment I replied to is thus
> The whole selling point of Apples AI stuff is that the processing for most things can be done on the phone and thus your private data won't have to leave you device
A desktop computer or server has substantially more power than an iphone even a nice one like the one which is the topic of the linked article because it has substantially more memory, power, cooling, and so forth.
I fully expect us to continue to rapidly expand what we can do with AI and such usages to require substantial resources to run wherein mobile devices will continue to be too grossly insufficient to run.
heyoni
5 days ago
And what your phone can’t do will be offloaded to servers. Meaning your phone can do a lot and an M1 processor isn’t necessarily a waste.
mschuster91
5 days ago
Training is, that requires absurd amounts of power. Inference / object detection? That can be done on devices as low-power as a raspberry pi.
beached_whale
5 days ago
Can turn the chip off faster to save power probably.
heyoni
5 days ago
It almost definitely does and probably always runs at a fraction of that speed while using up the battery. Even current gen phones don’t do face recognition unless you’re connected to a charger.
user
5 days ago
melling
5 days ago
Add a wireless keyboard, mouse and monitor then you’ve got a desktop computer.
Not gonna happen from Apple but I’m eagerly awaiting the day.
chairmanmow
5 days ago
And an operating system that's designed for it, because if you want to you can hook up those things now you can cobble something together hooking up those things but to call that experience "desktop like" is mostly held back by how much consideration iOS has put into the concept of a "cursor" designed for clicks. If you hook up a mouse to iOS and want a cursor, you need to turn on some assistive touch accessibility feature to get a circle that's about the size of an index finger tip, with about 10 times the click surface of an ordinary cursor. If you can activate a setting that feels like a hack and get past the bad cursor, only done 2/3 at a given time myself, but I'd imagine if you hook it up to a bigger screen, the resolution probably won't adapt and your cursor will be massive, but you can mirror an iPhone screen to a monitor. As far as using a wireless keyboard though, no issues I've really noted there, behaves like I'd expect a keyboard to, I was surprised when I could CMD-Tab to switch between apps on iOS like a desktop machine, surprised that feature exists in iOS because I don't see how you would invoke that except without an external keyboard, i.e. via touch, so it exceeded my expectations there by supporting that shortcut. If Apple elevated the cursor to less of an afterthought it would open things up a lot more.
melling
4 days ago
Yes, I want it to turn into macOS on the desktop.
dizhn
4 days ago
They started allowing console emulators on the store very recently.
michaelmrose
5 days ago
Mobile computing performance is largely bounded not by how much work you can do this second but by how much work you do without exhausting your battery too quickly to be usable or overheating.
Comparing them as if both were equally capable of going flat out is deceptive.
Other things being equal working faster means spinning down quicker and using less juice.
wenc
5 days ago
I need that kind of power, not for apps, but computational photography and videography.
para_parolu
5 days ago
These people will be fine with regular iphone 16.
idunnoman1222
5 days ago
Local AI obviously
troupo
5 days ago
Not with 8GB of RAM
mensetmanusman
5 days ago
How the ram is actually managed in the firmware can make the 8 GB number not entirely illuminating.
Now, this is the case for software graphics, but it might not be the case for LLMs.
LeoPanthera
5 days ago
640k ought to be enough for anybody, huh?
wredue
5 days ago
That was in a time when people didn’t envision every person in the first world having access to their entire lives at their finger tips.
I would tend to agree that today’s apps are… dogshit. Without a doubt, the vast majority of today workloads (99.9%) should be able to run on 2008ish era processing power if they were well programmed.